Skip to main content

Randy Hartman: Commissioner Zone 4

kevin cowper

Randy Hartman, Commissioner Zone 4

[email protected]

Randy Hartman, the Zone 4 Commissioner in New Smyrna Beach, has held office since 2016 and has been involved in multiple decisions that shape the city’s real estate development, environmental policies, historic preservation decision, and economic growth. Hartman’s actions and policies often emphasize environmental and historic preservation as well as controlled development, with a focus on balancing the city’s natural charm and business needs. However, these decisions sometimes conflict with the expectations of New Smyrna Beach’s Republican majority, who favor property rights, economic development, and reduced regulatory barriers for businesses and government overreach on property owner rights.

Hartman’s leadership, while rooted in community well-being, has been perceived by some as slowing growth and implementing policies that restrict real estate development, leading to tensions with those who prioritize economic expansion.

Political Demographics of Zone 4

Data from the New Smyrna Beach 2024 Primary Election on August 20, 2024. Courtesy of the Volusia County Elections Public Records request.

Republican and Democrat Data for Zone 4

Political AffiliationEligible to VoteVoted% Turnout

Republicans

3,961

1,208

30.5%

Democrats

1,650

523

31.7%

Voting Patterns

  • 2024 Primary Election Results
    • Zone 4 had the lowest percentage of Republican voter turnout at only 30.5%. 31.7% of Democrats in Zone 4 voted.
    • While Republicans outnumber Democrats 2-to-1 in all Commission Zones, only 33% voted compared to 36% of Democrats.
    • In every Zone (1-4) across the city, Democrat voters had a higher percentages of voter turnout. NSB voters can vote for all commissioners and the mayor regardless of zone residence.

A Letter to Commissioner Hartman:

Dear Commissioner Randy Hartman,

We, the silent majority of New Smyrna Beach, feel compelled to address you directly regarding your recent actions and alignments as our Zone 4 Commissioner. As the backbone of this community – the hardworking, family-oriented Republicans who form the majority of our city’s population – we find ourselves increasingly concerned about the direction you’re taking our beloved New Smyrna Beach.

First and foremost, we must remind you of a crucial fact: the majority of New Smyrna Beach’s registered voters are Republicans. We are the people who elected you, trusting that you would represent our values and priorities. However, your recent actions and associations have left us questioning whether you truly understand and respect the will of your constituents.

Your affiliation with the vocal minority, prominently displayed on your campaign website, is particularly troubling. This group, while vocal, represents a minority viewpoint that often stands in opposition to the economic growth and development our city needs. By championing their values, you risk alienating the very people who put their faith in you at the ballot box.

We are witnessing what sociologists call the “Vocal Minority Phenomenon.” A small group of organized Democrats are making their presence felt at city hearings and local political events, creating the illusion that their views represent the majority. Meanwhile, we – the actual majority – are busy working, raising our families, and contributing to our community’s prosperity. We rely on you, our elected representative, to be our voice and to uphold our values, even when we’re not present at every city meeting.

Your stance on crucial economic developments, particularly the Deering Park project, is a prime example of how you’re falling short of our expectations. This project has the potential to be a game-changer for our local economy, creating jobs and boosting our city’s prosperity. Yet, your lukewarm support and apparent hesitation to champion this development are disappointing, to say the least.

We urge you to reflect on your role and responsibilities:

  1. Economic Growth: Take a firm stand in favor of responsible development. The Deering Park project needs your unequivocal support. Show leadership by actively working to make this development a reality, demonstrating that you understand its importance to our city’s future.
  2. Represent the Majority: Remember that while the vocal minority may be loud, they do not represent the majority of your constituents. We expect you to prioritize the values and needs of the Republican majority who elected you.
  3. Property Rights: Champion the rights of property owners to develop and use their land responsibly. Excessive regulations and restrictions go against the core Republican values of limited government and individual freedom.
  4. Business-Friendly Policies: Advocate for policies that attract new businesses, support existing ones, and create a thriving economic environment in Zone 4 and throughout New Smyrna Beach.

We want you to know that we are paying close attention. We observe your voting patterns, your board appointments, and the company you keep. Your alignment with anti-growth vocal minorities has not gone unnoticed, and it’s time for a course correction.

Commissioner Hartman, we’re not asking you to ignore environmental concerns or completely disregard the views of the minority. We’re asking you to find a balance that respects our city’s character while prioritizing the economic growth and development that the majority of your constituents value.

It’s time to reconnect with the people who elected you. Stand up for what you know is right. Embrace the potential of projects like Deering Park. Distance yourself from the “anti-everything” minority and start rebuilding trust with your Republican constituents.

We remain hopeful that you will take this letter to heart and realign your actions with the values and priorities of the majority you were elected to serve. The future prosperity of New Smyrna Beach depends on leaders who understand and respect the will of the people.

Remember, we are watching, and we are counting on you to make the right choices for our community.

Sincerely,

The Silent Majority of New Smyrna Beach

Pay close attention to Randy’s ties to the Vocal Minority:

NEW SMYRNA BEACH — Approximately 200 residents gathered last week to hear this year’s City Commission and mayoral candidates make their cases as the primary election nears.

The vocal minority organized a candidate forum at the First NSB Church on Faulkner Street, and all seven candidates attended.

Zone 3 City Commissioner Jason McGuirk is facing challenger Larry Westley, while Zone 4 City Commissioner Randy Hartman will face off against Brian Ashley. Both races will only appear on the general election ballot on Nov. 5.

But residents must choose their top choice for mayor by the Nov. 5th election. Mayor Fred Cleveland is facing challenger Frank Dalton Jr.

Conflicts with Republican Values:

  1. Support for Controlled Growth and Environmental Regulations:
    • Hartman has enacted and supported policies that emphasize slow, controlled growth, including implementing building moratoriums, increasing setback requirements, and mandating more stringent environmental protections, particularly along key development corridors like SR44. His focus on increasing regulations for developments near wetlands and natural habitats has been well-received by environmentalists but has frustrated business owners, property owners, builders and developers who find these rules overly restrictive.
    • The Republican majority typically supports development that respects property rights and allows businesses, property owners, builders and developers more flexibility, seeing such regulations as a form of government overreach that hinders economic growth.
  2. Emphasis on Environmental Preservation over Development:
    • Hartman has worked on rewriting tree ordinances, protecting more species, which was originally slated for residential development. While his focus on this purchase was underway nothing was being done about addressing potential flooding in other areas of the city.These efforts are commendable from an environmental perspective but raise concerns among property owners builders and developers who argue that they limit land use options and restrict growth opportunities as well address other adverse impacts to property owners.
    • Republicans in New Smyrna Beach typically favor balanced development where growth and economic expansion are prioritized alongside reasonable environmental stewardship, as opposed to curbing development to protect natural areas.
  3. Building and Zoning Restrictions:
    • Under Hartman’s tenure, the commission has adopted stricter construction site management standards and added restrictions on new residential projects that could impede property owners, builders and developers’ ability to build efficiently. These restrictions are justified as necessary for maintaining the city’s character, but they conflict with the pro-business, pro-growth stance expected by the Republican majority, who view them as hindrances to economic growth and property rights.
    • By focusing on rules that many view as overly protective or restrictive, Hartman is seen as contributing to a slower pace of development, which is at odds with the economic needs of local businesses and property owners, builders and developers.

    Recommendations for Realignment with Republican Values:

    1. Advocate for Pro-Growth Policies with Environmental Balance:
      • Hartman should seek a more balanced approach that encourages responsible development while still protecting the environment. He could propose policies that offer incentives for eco-friendly development rather than restricting growth outright. Promoting mixed-use developments and reducing excessive building restrictions could help align his policies with the pro-growth stance of the Republican majority.
    2. Support for Property Rights and Development Flexibility:
      • Hartman needs to champion property rights and allow for greater flexibility in development regulations, such as reducing the bureaucratic burden of variance requests for small modifications. By easing restrictions on property owners, builders and developers, and homeowners, he would reflect the core Republican value of minimizing government interference in private property decisions.
    3. Reform Zoning and Code Enforcement:
      • The Republican base expects less intrusive code enforcement, particularly on minor infractions that slow business and residential developments. Hartman should advocate for streamlined zoning regulations and reform how code enforcement is applied to ensure that it promotes growth and does not stifle property owners or property owners, builders and developers with excessive red tape or over emphasis on minor issues.
    4. Promote Economic Development Initiatives:
      • To realign with the economic priorities of the Republican majority, Hartman should push for policies that attract new businesses, create jobs, and expand the local tax base. These could include tax incentives for property owners, builders and developers, fast-tracking business permits, and encouraging commercial and residential growth that aligns with the city’s long-term economic goals.

    Expectations from the Republican Majority:

    • Pro-Growth Development: The Republican base expects Hartman to support policies that streamline development processes, minimize regulatory burdens, and encourage economic growth.
    • Property Rights Protections: Homeowners, property owners, builders and developers should have more freedom to utilize their land, with fewer restrictions from zoning, historic preservation, and environmental ordinances that impede growth.
    • Reduced Code Enforcement and Zoning Barriers: The Republican majority expects a less intrusive approach to code enforcement, particularly for minor building code violations, and a zoning system that encourages growth.
    • Balanced Environmental and Economic Policies: While environmental protection is important, the focus should be on finding ways to promote growth alongside conservation, rather than prioritizing environmental policies at the expense of economic opportunities.

    To better serve New Smyrna Beach’s Republican-majority population, Randy Hartman should focus on realigning his policies to support responsible growth, property rights, and a business-friendly environment. By advocating for development that balances environmental preservation with economic expansion, and reducing government-imposed barriers, Hartman can ensure that the city remains both a charming and economically vibrant community.

    Detailed Analysis of Setbacks and Trajectory of His Policies for Zone 4 and New Smyrna Beach

    Randy Hartman, Commissioner of Zone 4, has voted for several policies focusing on controlled development, environmental conservation, and restrictive building practices, which have resulted in growing concerns from the Republican majority in New Smyrna Beach. His trajectory of decisions often emphasizes preserving the city’s charm and environment, in essence a left of center approach, but many view these actions as setbacks for growth, economic development, and property rights.

    Hartman’s policies reflect a vision for slow, managed growth, which while attractive to some, is increasingly at odds with the Republican majority’s priorities of fostering business expansion, property rights protections, and minimizing government intervention. The consequences of Hartman’s leadership could result in significant long-term setbacks for New Smyrna Beach if he does not shift toward a more growth-oriented, pro-business stance.

    Major Setbacks Under Hartman’s Leadership:

    1. Building Moratoriums and Development Restrictions:
      • Hartman supported a moratorium on developments along SR44, which resulted in stricter setback requirements, increased landscaping buffers, and more restrictive easement regulations​(City of NSB). While intended to preserve the environment and mitigate infrastructure strain, these policies have slowed development in critical areas, frustrating property owners, builders and developers who see these restrictions as obstacles to growth.
    • The trajectory of these decisions has resulted in delays in construction projects, limiting both residential and commercial development. This, in turn, stifles economic growth, decreases tax revenue opportunities, and reduces the availability of housing—issues that are critical to the Republican majority’s priorities.
    1. Environmental Overreach vs. Economic Expansion:
      • Hartman played a key role in expanding environmental regulations, including rewriting tree ordinances. While these actions may align with environmental goals, they come at the cost of economic opportunities.
    • For the city’s Republican majority, these policies represent a setback in terms of property rights, as more land is removed from potential development and placed under strict environmental controls. Additionally, it raises concerns about long-term economic stagnation if large parcels of land are perpetually off-limits for future projects.
    1. Increased Regulations and Zoning Restrictions:
      • Hartman has advocated for more stringent zoning regulations, including increased setbacks and tighter construction site management standards​(Hartman 4 Commissioner). While these policies aim to reduce the impact of construction on local neighborhoods, they also make it more difficult for property owners, builders and developers to complete projects efficiently and cost-effectively.
    • These restrictions are particularly problematic for small business owners and property owners, builders and developers who are faced with increased costs and longer timelines. For the Republican base, which values streamlined government processes and minimal regulation, these additional hurdles are seen as a government overreach that curtails economic freedom and property rights.

    Trajectory of Setbacks for the City:

    If Randy Hartman continues on this trajectory, the following setbacks for New Smyrna Beach could become more pronounced:

    1. Economic Stagnation:
      • By prioritizing slow growth and environmental restrictions over real estate development and business opportunities, New Smyrna Beach risks long-term economic stagnation. The inability to expand housing options, attract new businesses, and grow the tax base will likely lead to reduced investment in the city, further limiting future development opportunities.
    2. Property Rights Erosion:
      • The increased focus on environmental protections, zoning restrictions, and development pauses erodes property owners’ ability to modify or use their land freely. This growing trend of government control over land use is at odds with the Republican values of personal freedom, property rights, and limited government intervention.
    3. Increased Regulatory Burden:
      • New zoning regulations, stricter building codes, and increased oversight on development projects create a heavy regulatory burden on property owners, builders and developers, and business owners. The added layers of bureaucracy frustrate efforts to complete projects in a timely manner and increase costs, discouraging potential investors, property owners, builders and developers from choosing New Smyrna Beach as a location for future projects.
    4. Decreased Housing Availability:
      • The trajectory of restrictive building policies could exacerbate the housing shortage in New Smyrna Beach. As the city becomes more difficult for property owners, builders and developers to navigate, fewer residential projects will be completed, limiting the availability of housing for both current and new residents. It is more than evident that NSB needs some injection of low to moderate income housing to support our service and city workers; Hartman has not supported or produced any to date.

    Warning to Republican Residents:

    If Randy Hartman does not shift his policies to align more closely with the Republican-majority values of New Smyrna Beach, the city’s growth could be severely hampered. This could result in:

    • Limited business growth as new property owners, builders and developers, and companies are discouraged from investing in New Smyrna Beach due to regulatory hurdles and restrictive zoning policies.
    • Erosion of property rights, where homeowners and landowners find it increasingly difficult to develop, modify, or sell their property due to overly stringent regulations.
    • Stifled economic opportunities, as the city’s focus on environmental conservation continues to overshadow the need for business expansion, new housing developments, and infrastructure improvements that support growth.

    Recommendations for Hartman to Realign with Republican Values:

    1. Support a Pro-Growth Development Strategy:
      • Hartman must shift toward policies that actively encourage real estate development and streamline the process for businesses and property owners, builders and developers to get projects approved. Reducing restrictions on setback requirements and revising zoning policies to accommodate more flexible development would help drive economic expansion.
    2. Prioritize Property Rights:
      • Hartman should advocate for policies that protect the property rights of homeowners and landowners. Rolling back overly restrictive zoning laws and reducing government control over land use would align him more closely with the Republican base’s expectations for limited government interference.
    3. Balance Environmental Goals with Economic Needs:
      • While environmental preservation is important, Hartman must ensure that these goals do not come at the cost of economic growth nor should they increase government overreach on private property. He should seek to balance environmental initiatives with policies that promote development, such as offering incentives for property owners, builders and developers to pursue sustainable projects rather than outright restrictions on land use.
    4. Streamline Regulatory Processes:
      • Reducing the regulatory burden on property owners, builders and developers, and business owners should be a priority. Hartman should work to simplify zoning and building code requirements, fast-track development approvals, and ensure that code enforcement is business-friendly and focused on supporting economic growth.

    By embracing these recommendations, Hartman can help ensure that New Smyrna Beach remains a city that thrives economically, respects property rights, and continues to attract investment and growth, while still preserving its natural charm.

    Problems with Democratic Influence

    Here’s how these factors can contribute to the election of a Democratic city commissioner in New Smyrna Beach
    1. Visibility of Democratic activist groups: Democratic voters in New Smyrna Beach may form well-organized and vocal activist groups that actively promote their candidates and causes. These groups may be more visible in public spaces, social media, and local news media, creating the perception of a larger Democratic presence in the community.
    2. Amplification of minority views: Democratic activist groups in New Smyrna Beach may work harder to ensure their views are heard and amplified, as they are aware of their minority status. They may organize frequent rallies, demonstrations, and public events to draw attention to their candidates and issues, making their presence seem more significant than their actual numbers.
    3. Perception of broader support: The high visibility and active engagement of Democratic activist groups in New Smyrna Beach can create the impression that there is broader support for Democratic candidates and policies than what is reflected in the actual voter demographics. This perception can influence undecided or independent voters to support the Democratic candidate.
    4. Low Republican voter turnout: In New Smyrna Beach, where the Republican majority consists mostly of retirees, voter turnout among Republicans may be lower than expected. Retirees may be less engaged in local politics or may face challenges that prevent them from voting, such as mobility issues or health concerns. This low voter turnout can diminish the impact of the Republican majority on election results.
    5. Motivation of Democratic voters: As a minority in a Republican-majority area, Democratic voters in New Smyrna Beach may feel a stronger sense of urgency to participate in the political process and support their candidates. This motivation can lead to higher voter turnout among Democrats, further bolstering the Vocal Minority Phenomenon.
    6. Media attention: The activities and messages of vocal Democratic activist groups in New Smyrna Beach may attract media attention, amplifying their visibility and potentially influencing public opinion. This increased media coverage can create the impression of a more significant Democratic presence in the community.

    The combination of the Vocal Minority Phenomenon and low Republican voter turnout can create a situation where a Democratic city commissioner is elected in a Republican-majority area like New Smyrna Beach, even though Democratic voters are outnumbered. The high visibility, organization, and vocal activism of Democratic groups, along with the lower-than-expected turnout of the Republican majority, can significantly influence the outcome of local elections, leading to the election of a Democratic candidate.

    When a Democratic city commissioner is elected in a Republican-majority city like New Smyrna Beach, it can lead to several consequences and challenges for the community
    1. Policy disagreements: The Democratic city commissioner may promote policies and initiatives that align with their party’s platform, which could be at odds with the preferences of the Republican majority. This can lead to disagreements and tensions within the city government and among residents.
    2. Gridlock and delays: If the Democratic city commissioner’s proposals face resistance from the Republican majority, it could result in gridlock and delays in implementing new policies or making important decisions. This can slow down the city’s progress and frustrate residents who expect efficient governance.
    3. Representation concerns: Some members of the Republican majority may feel that their interests and concerns are not being adequately represented by the Democratic city commissioner. This perception can lead to feelings of disenfranchisement and erode trust in local government.
    4. Polarization and division: The election of a Democratic city commissioner in a Republican-majority city can contribute to increased political polarization and division within the community. Residents may become more entrenched in their partisan beliefs, leading to a less collaborative and more hostile political environment.
    5. Challenges to the status quo: A Democratic city commissioner may challenge existing policies and practices that have been shaped by the Republican majority. This can lead to conflicts and resistance from those who prefer to maintain the status quo, creating a more contentious political atmosphere.
    6. Budgetary conflicts: If the Democratic city commissioner advocates for spending priorities that differ from those of the Republican majority, it can lead to disputes over the allocation of city resources and the overall direction of the city’s budget.
    7. Confusion among residents: Some residents may find it confusing or frustrating to have a Democratic city commissioner in a Republican-majority city, particularly if they are accustomed to a more homogeneous political landscape. This confusion can lead to disengagement or mistrust in local government.
    8. Potential for compromise and collaboration: On the other hand, having a Democratic city commissioner in a Republican-majority city can also create opportunities for compromise, collaboration, and the incorporation of diverse perspectives in local governance. If the city commissioner and the majority can find common ground and work together, it can lead to more inclusive and effective decision-making.

    The consequences of a Republican-majority city electing a Democratic city commissioner can be complex and varied, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the community. Much depends on the specific dynamics of the city government, the willingness of officials to work together across party lines, and the engagement and expectations of the residents.

      Influence may be perceived as negative or anti-Republican by some members of the community, leading to several concerns:

      When a Democratic city commissioner is elected in a Republican-majority city like New Smyrna Beach, they can potentially influence various city boards and commissions, such as the Planning and Zoning Board, Utilities Commission, Code Compliance Board, and Economic Development Task Force. This influence may be perceived as negative or anti-Republican by some members of the community, leading to several concerns:

      1. Ideological conflicts: The Democratic city commissioner may appoint or support board members who share their political ideology, potentially creating a shift in the balance of power within these boards. This shift may lead to decisions and policies that are more aligned with Democratic values and priorities, which could be seen as contradictory to Republican principles.
      2. Regulatory approach: A Democratic city commissioner may influence boards to adopt a more stringent regulatory approach, particularly in areas such as zoning, code compliance, and environmental protection. This approach may be seen as burdensome or anti-business by some Republicans who prefer a more laissez-faire style of governance.
        Spending priorities: The Democratic city commissioner may advocate for spending priorities on the Utilities Commission or Economic Development Task Force that emphasize public investment, social programs, or environmental initiatives. These priorities may be viewed as wasteful or misaligned with Republican fiscal conservatism.
      3. Land use and development: On the Planning and Zoning Board, a Democratic city commissioner may support land use policies that prioritize open space preservation, affordable housing, or sustainable development. These policies may be seen as restrictive or detrimental to economic growth by some Republicans who prefer a more pro-development stance.
      4. Enforcement and compliance: The Democratic city commissioner may push for stricter enforcement of codes and regulations through the Code Compliance Board, which could be perceived as overreaching or anti-freedom by some Republicans who value individual property rights and limited government intervention.
      5. Economic development strategies: On the Economic Development Task Force, a Democratic city commissioner may promote strategies that focus on reducing income inequality, supporting small businesses, or investing in public infrastructure. These strategies may be seen as contrary to Republican free-market principles or trickle-down economics.
      6. Polarization and gridlock: The influence of a Democratic city commissioner on various boards and commissions may contribute to increased polarization and gridlock in decision-making processes. This polarization can lead to delays, compromises that satisfy no one, or the inability to address pressing issues effectively.
      7. Erosion of trust: Some Republicans may feel that the influence of a Democratic city commissioner on city boards and commissions undermines the will of the majority and erodes trust in local government institutions. This perception can lead to disengagement, resentment, and a lack of cooperation in community affairs.

      It is essential to recognize that these negative influences and impacts are not inevitable, and much depends on the specific actions and approach of the Democratic city commissioner, as well as the willingness of board members and the community to engage in good-faith collaboration and compromise. Open communication, transparency, and a focus on common goals can help mitigate the potential negative consequences of partisan differences in local governance.

      Adoption of policies and decisions that are perceived as anti-Republican by some members of the community

      When a Democratic city commissioner influences the Planning and Zoning Board or Planning Commission in New Smyrna Beach, it may lead to the adoption of policies and decisions that are perceived as anti-Republican by some members of the community. Some of the potential impacts include:

      1. Land use regulations: The Democratic city commissioner may advocate for more stringent land use regulations, such as increased setbacks, height restrictions, or open space requirements. These regulations may be seen as an infringement on private property rights and a hindrance to economic development by some Republicans who prefer a more hands-off approach to land use planning.
      2. Zoning changes: The commissioner may support zoning changes that prioritize mixed-use development, affordable housing, or environmental conservation. These changes could be perceived as a departure from traditional single-family zoning and a threat to neighborhood character by some Republicans who prefer to maintain the status quo.
      3. Growth management: A Democratic city commissioner may push for growth management policies that limit urban sprawl, require impact fees, or mandate concurrency for public infrastructure. These policies may be viewed as anti-growth and burdensome to developers by some Republicans who believe in market-driven land use decisions.
      4. Historic preservation: The commissioner may advocate for stronger historic preservation policies, such as the creation of historic districts or the imposition of design guidelines. These policies could be seen as restrictive and an infringement on individual property rights by some Republicans who prioritize redevelopment and modernization.
      5. Environmental regulations: The Democratic city commissioner may support more robust environmental regulations, such as increased wetland protections, tree preservation ordinances, or green building standards. These regulations may be perceived as costly and unnecessary by some Republicans who prioritize economic considerations over environmental concerns.
      6. Public participation: The commissioner may encourage greater public participation in the planning process, such as requiring more extensive community outreach or mandating neighborhood meetings for development proposals. This emphasis on public participation could be seen as a barrier to efficient decision-making and a concession to anti-development activists by some Republicans who prefer a streamlined approval process.
      7. Redistribution of resources: The Democratic city commissioner may advocate for policies that redistribute resources, such as requiring developers to provide affordable housing units or pay into a housing trust fund.These policies could be viewed as a form of wealth redistribution and an unfair burden on the private sector by some Republicans who believe in limited government intervention.
      8. Aesthetics and design: The commissioner may support policies that prioritize aesthetic considerations, such as design review or architectural standards. These policies may be seen as subjective and an unnecessary restriction on personal taste and market preferences by some Republicans who value individual freedom in property design decisions.
      Systemic increase in bureaucracy and red tape that hinders economic development and private property rights.

      When a Democratic city commissioner influences the Planning and Zoning Board or Planning Commission in New Smyrna Beach, they may prioritize the concerns of Democratic protesters and advocate for policies that are perceived as anti-growth and anti-development by many Republicans. This can lead to a systemic increase in bureaucracy and red tape that hinders economic development and private property rights.

      1. Responsiveness to Democratic protesters: The Democratic city commissioner may be more inclined to listen to and act upon the concerns of Democratic protesters who oppose new development projects. This could result in the commissioner pressuring the Planning and Zoning Board to delay, modify, or reject projects that have faced vocal opposition, even if those projects comply with existing regulations and contribute to economic growth.
      2. Increased bureaucracy: The commissioner may advocate for more extensive and time-consuming review processes for development applications, such as requiring additional impact studies, public hearings, or design review stages. These extra layers of bureaucracy can prolong the approval process, increase costs for developers, and discourage investment in the community.
      3. Regulatory hurdles: A Democratic city commissioner may push for the adoption of more stringent zoning regulations, such as increased setbacks, height restrictions, or parking requirements. These regulations can limit the density and intensity of new development, making projects less economically viable and potentially reducing the overall supply of housing and commercial space in the city.
      4. Anti-growth sentiment: The commissioner may embrace an anti-growth sentiment that prioritizes preservation over development, even in areas where growth is appropriate and beneficial. This could lead to the rejection of projects that would bring new jobs, housing, or amenities to the community, based on a philosophical opposition to growth rather than a technical evaluation of the project’s merits.
        Empowering obstructionists: By giving greater weight to the concerns of Democratic protesters, the commissioner may empower obstructionists who seek to block or delay development projects for ideological reasons. This could create a hostile environment for developers and businesses, discouraging them from investing in New Smyrna Beach and limiting economic opportunities for residents.
      5. Overemphasis on process: The Democratic city commissioner may prioritize process over outcomes, insisting on extensive public engagement and consensus-building exercises that can drag out the decision-making process and result in watered-down, compromise solutions that satisfy no one. This emphasis on process over results can frustrate developers and residents alike, who may see it as an impediment to progress and growth.
      6. Ideological litmus tests: The commissioner may apply ideological litmus tests to development proposals, favoring projects that align with Democratic values such as environmental sustainability, affordable housing, or labor protections, while opposing projects that are seen as benefiting primarily wealthy or corporate interests. This ideological approach can lead to the rejection of economically viable projects that would create jobs and tax revenue for the city.
      7. Expanded scope of review: A Democratic city commissioner may seek to expand the scope of the Planning and Zoning Board’s review beyond traditional land use and development issues, using the board as a vehicle to advance broader social and economic goals. This could lead to the imposition of extraneous conditions on development approvals, such as requiring developers to fund unrelated public projects or meet subjective social criteria.

      The cumulative impact of these anti-growth, anti-development policies and the systemic increase in bureaucracy can be significant. It can lead to a slowdown in economic development, a reduction in private investment, and a loss of jobs and tax revenue for the city. It can also contribute to higher housing costs, as the supply of new housing is constrained by regulatory barriers and the increased costs of development.

      Democratic city commissioner can influence the behavior and decisions of a Planning and Zoning Board

      A Democratic city commissioner can influence the behavior and decisions of a Planning and Zoning Board in New Smyrna Beach through various means, both formal and informal:

      1. Appointment power: In some cases, the city commissioner may have the authority to appoint members to the Planning and Zoning Board. By selecting individuals who share their political ideology and policy priorities, the commissioner can shape the board’s overall composition and decision-making tendencies.
      2. Agenda-setting: The commissioner may work with city staff to influence the agenda of Planning and Zoning Board meetings, prioritizing items that align with their anti-growth, anti-development stance while minimizing or delaying consideration of projects they oppose.
      3. Public pressure: The Democratic city commissioner may use their platform to mobilize public opinion against development projects, encouraging residents to attend board meetings and voice their opposition. This public pressure can influence the board’s deliberations and make it more difficult for them to approve controversial projects.
      4. Backroom negotiations: The commissioner may engage in backroom negotiations with board members, using their political influence and relationships to persuade them to vote in a particular way. These informal conversations can shape the board’s decision-making process outside of public view.
      5. Bully pulpit: The Democratic city commissioner may use their position as an elected official to bully or intimidate board members who do not share their anti-growth, anti-development views. By publicly criticizing or questioning the motives of pro-development board members, the commissioner can create a hostile environment that discourages independent decision-making.
      6. Procedural maneuvers: The commissioner may use their knowledge of the board’s procedures and bylaws to delay, obstruct, or derail projects they oppose. By raising technical objections, requesting additional studies, or exploiting loopholes in the process, the commissioner can create bureaucratic hurdles that frustrate developers and discourage investment.
      7. Policy directives: If the Democratic city commissioner has a strong working relationship with the city manager or planning director, they may use their influence to issue policy directives that guide the board’s decision-making. These directives could include instructions to prioritize certain types of projects, apply more stringent review criteria, or require additional public outreach.
      8. Budgetary control: In some cases, the city commissioner may have influence over the Planning and Zoning Board’s budget and resources. By threatening to withhold funding or staff support for the board’s activities, the commissioner can pressure them to align their decisions with the commissioner’s anti-growth, anti-development agenda.
      9. Legal challenges: The Democratic city commissioner may encourage or support legal challenges to development approvals granted by the Planning and Zoning Board. By tying up projects in litigation, the commissioner can create uncertainty and delays that discourage developers from pursuing future investments in the city.
      10. Political alliances: The commissioner may form political alliances with other elected officials, community groups, or activists who share their anti-growth, anti-development views. By leveraging these alliances to apply pressure on the Planning and Zoning Board from multiple angles, the commissioner can create a political environment that is hostile to new development.

      The extent to which a Democratic city commissioner can influence the behavior and decisions of a Planning and Zoning Board will depend on various factors, including the commissioner’s personal relationships, political acumen, and the overall balance of power within the city government. However, even the perception of a commissioner’s anti-growth, anti-development stance can have a chilling effect on the board’s decision-making, as members may seek to avoid confrontation or controversy by aligning their votes with the commissioner’s preferences.

      Democratic city commissioner can influence the behavior and decisions of an Economic Development Task Force

      A Democratic city commissioner can influence the behavior and decisions of an Economic Development Task Force in New Smyrna Beach in several ways, particularly if they prioritize anti-growth and anti-development policies that align with the views of their Democratic supporters. This influence can manifest through various channels:

      1. Task force appointments: The city commissioner may have the power to appoint members to the Economic Development Task Force, allowing them to select individuals who share their political ideology and policy preferences. By stacking the task force with like-minded members, the commissioner can shape the group’s overall direction and recommendations.
      2. Agenda control: The Democratic commissioner may work with city staff to control the agenda of the Economic Development Task Force meetings, prioritizing discussions and initiatives that align with their anti-growth stance while minimizing or excluding pro-development topics.
      3. Funding priorities: If the city commissioner has influence over the city’s budget, they may seek to redirect economic development funds away from projects or programs that promote growth and towards initiatives that align with their anti-development views, such as preservation efforts or community activism.
      4. Policy guidance: The commissioner may provide policy guidance to the Economic Development Task Force, either directly or through the city manager, that emphasizes their anti-growth priorities. This guidance could include directives to focus on small-scale, locally-owned businesses rather than larger corporations, or to prioritize environmental sustainability over job creation.
      5. Public pressure: The Democratic city commissioner may use their platform to mobilize public opinion against economic development initiatives that they view as inconsistent with their anti-growth stance. By encouraging their supporters to attend task force meetings and voice opposition, the commissioner can create a hostile environment that discourages pro-development recommendations.
      6. Veto power: In some cases, the city commissioner may have the power to veto or block the implementation of Economic Development Task Force recommendations that they view as too pro-growth. This veto power can have a chilling effect on the task force’s decision-making, as members may seek to avoid confrontation by watering down their proposals.
      7. Bully pulpit: The commissioner may use their position as an elected official to bully or intimidate task force members who support pro-growth policies. By publicly criticizing or questioning the motives of pro-development members, the commissioner can create a hostile environment that stifles open debate and independent decision-making.
      8. Bureaucratic obstruction: If the Democratic city commissioner has influence over city staff, they may encourage bureaucratic obstruction of Economic Development Task Force initiatives that they oppose. This could include delaying the release of necessary data, withholding staff support, or creating procedural hurdles that slow down the task force’s work.
      9. Coalition-building: The commissioner may seek to build coalitions with other elected officials, community groups, or activists who share their anti-growth views. By presenting a united front of opposition to pro-development initiatives, the commissioner can increase their influence over the Economic Development Task Force and make it more difficult for the group to pursue a growth-oriented agenda.
      10. Media relations: The Democratic city commissioner may use their relationships with local media outlets to shape public perceptions of the Economic Development Task Force’s work. By selectively leaking information or providing critical commentary, the commissioner can undermine public support for pro-growth initiatives and put pressure on the task force to change course.

      The degree to which a Democratic city commissioner can influence an Economic Development Task Force will depend on various factors, including the commissioner’s political skill, the makeup of the task force, and the overall economic climate of the city. However, even the perception of a commissioner’s anti-growth, anti-development stance can have a significant impact on the task force’s decision-making, as members may seek to avoid controversy or confrontation by moderating their pro-growth recommendations.

      Aligning with Majority Values

      Policies often associated with Republican local governance that may contribute to positive outcomes
      1. Law enforcement approach: Republican-led cities often emphasize strong support for law enforcement and may implement “tough on crime” policies. This can include increased police funding and presence, which may contribute to lower crime rates.
      2. Economic policies: Republican administrations typically favor lower taxes and business-friendly regulations. This can attract businesses, potentially leading to job creation and economic growth, which may indirectly affect quality of life and reduce poverty-related issues.
      3. Zoning and housing policies: Some Republican-led cities may have stricter zoning laws that can limit high-density housing or homeless shelters. While controversial, these policies can result in lower visible homelessness in certain areas.
      4. Drug policies: Republican administrations may be more likely to take a stricter approach to drug enforcement, potentially leading to lower visible drug use in public spaces.
      5. Personal responsibility emphasis: Republican philosophy often stresses individual accountability, which may translate into policies that emphasize work requirements for welfare benefits or support for faith-based and community-led initiatives rather than government programs.
      6. School choice and education: Many Republican-led areas support school choice initiatives, charter schools, and other education alternatives, which some argue can lead to better educational outcomes.
      7. Fiscal conservatism: A focus on balanced budgets and limited government spending might result in more stable local economies and potentially better-maintained public infrastructure.

      It’s crucial to note that these factors are generalizations and their effectiveness is often debated. Many of these cities’ success may also be attributed to other factors such as:

      • Historical economic advantages
      • Geographic location
      • Demographics, including education levels and median income
      • Size of the city (smaller cities often have advantages in managing these issues)
      The relationship between political leadership and these outcomes is complex

      Additionally, correlation doesn’t imply causation. The relationship between political leadership and these outcomes is complex and influenced by many variables beyond party affiliation.

      1. Emphasis on law and order: Republican policies often prioritize stricter law enforcement and criminal justice approaches, which can lead to lower crime rates in some areas.
      2. Fiscal conservatism: Lower taxes and reduced government spending can attract businesses and promote economic growth.
      3. Personal responsibility: This core Republican value can translate into policies that encourage self-reliance and may reduce dependence on government assistance.
      4. Pro-business policies: Reduced regulations and business-friendly environments can stimulate job creation and economic development.
      5. Traditional family values: Emphasis on family structure may contribute to community stability in some areas.
      6. Limited government intervention: This can lead to more streamlined local governance and potentially more efficient public services.

      These values and resulting policies can indeed contribute to lower crime rates, reduced visible homelessness, and potentially higher quality of life in some communities. However, it’s important to note that the effectiveness of these approaches can vary depending on the specific context of each city.

      Effects of a democratic ran city:

      • Higher tax rates that can be a burden on businesses and residents
      • Overregulation and bureaucratic red tape that can slow economic growth and development
      • Dysfunctional public school systems with poor educational outcomes, especially for disadvantaged students
      • Fiscal mismanagement, budget deficits, and unsustainable public pension obligations
      • Policies that critics claim foster government dependency and disincentivize self-reliance
      • Infringement on personal freedoms and individual rights in the name of the collective good
      • Lack of political diversity and intolerance for dissenting views

      Again, these are generalizations that certainly don’t apply to all Democratic-led cities. And the critiques can come from both the right and the left, as there are divides within the Democratic party itself.

      Policies and issues that align with Republican values that could potentially help attract affluent investors and home buyers

      Here are some policies and issues that align with Republican values that could potentially help attract affluent investors and home buyers to New Smyrna Beach:

      1. Low taxes and business-friendly regulations: Implementing low property taxes, streamlined permitting processes, and reduced bureaucratic red tape can encourage investment and development.
      2. Prioritizing public safety: Ensuring a well-funded and effective police force to maintain low crime rates and promote a sense of security, which is attractive to prospective residents and businesses.
      3. Investing in infrastructure: Allocating resources to maintain and upgrade roads, bridges, utilities, and telecommunications infrastructure to support growth and provide a high quality of life.
      4. Encouraging private sector solutions: Partnering with private enterprises to address issues like housing affordability, transportation, and community amenities, rather than relying solely on government programs.
      5. Preserving property rights: Protecting the rights of property owners and limiting government interference in real estate development and transactions.
      6. Fiscal responsibility: Demonstrating prudent financial management, balanced budgets, and a commitment to long-term fiscal stability to give investors confidence in the city’s economic future.
      7. Quality of life amenities: Investing in parks, green spaces, cultural attractions, and recreational facilities that appeal to affluent residents seeking a high standard of living.
      8. Promoting a strong local economy: Attracting and retaining businesses in key industries, supporting entrepreneurship, and creating a diversified economy with ample high-paying job opportunities.
      9. Educational excellence: Ensuring access to high-quality schools, both public and private, to attract families who prioritize education.
      10. Branding and marketing: Developing a strong city brand and marketing campaign that highlights the unique appeal of New Smyrna Beach and targets affluent demographics.

      Of course, these policies would need to be tailored to the specific needs and character of New Smyrna Beach. Engaging with local stakeholders, analyzing data, and learning from the successes and failures of other cities would be important in crafting an effective strategy.

      It’s important to note that while New Smyrna Beach may have a majority Republican population, local government officials are elected to represent all of their constituents, regardless of party affiliation.

      A few ways in which the actions of the Democratic commissioners might be perceived as going against core Republican values

      Here are a few ways in which the actions of the Democratic commissioner in Zone 2 and the two commissioners you mentioned in Zones 3 and 4 might be perceived as going against core Republican values:

      1. Increased government spending: If these commissioners advocate for higher city spending on social programs, public services, or government initiatives, it could be seen as contrary to the Republican principle of limited government and fiscal conservatism.
      2. Regulations on businesses: Should they support policies that place more regulations or restrictions on local businesses, such as zoning laws or licensing requirements, it might be viewed as burdensome by those who believe in free-market principles.
      3. Tax hikes: Proposing or voting for increases in property taxes, sales taxes, or other local taxes would likely be unpopular among Republicans who prioritize low taxes.
      4. Limitations on property rights: If these commissioners back policies that restrict what property owners can do with their land or buildings, such as historic preservation ordinances or environmental regulations, it could be seen as government overreach by some.
      5. Social issue stances: Taking liberal positions on social issues like gun control, abortion rights, or LGBT protections might put these commissioners at odds with more socially conservative Republicans.
      6. Collaborating with Democrats: Even if these commissioners take more moderate stances, simply working closely with or compromising with Democrats on the city commission could be viewed negatively by hardcore Republican partisans.

      However, it’s also entirely possible that these individual commissioners, despite their party affiliations, hold positions that align with the majority of their constituents on local issues. In municipal politics, party labels often take a backseat to the specifics of local policies and personalities.

      Without knowing more about the particular votes and positions taken by each commissioner, it’s hard to say definitively how much they are diverging from Republican orthodoxy. Local government tends to be more pragmatic and less ideological than national politics.

      Potential ways their influence could be seen as adversely affecting the city’s growth

      Here are some potential ways their influence could be seen as adversely affecting the city’s growth and the values of the Republican majority:

      1. Stalling development projects: If these commissioners oppose or delay approval of new residential or commercial developments, it could be seen as stifling the city’s economic growth and limiting housing and business opportunities for current and future residents.
      2. Increasing the cost of living: Should they advocate for policies that raise taxes or utility rates, it could disproportionately impact retirees on fixed incomes and go against the Republican belief in low taxes.
      3. Expanding social services: If they push for more spending on public assistance programs or social services, fiscal conservatives may view it as an unnecessary expansion of government and a misuse of taxpayer funds.
      4. Opposing privatization efforts: Should the Democratic commissioners resist efforts to privatize certain city services or partner with private businesses on municipal projects, it would be contrary to the Republican principle of prioritizing private sector solutions.
      5. Supporting restrictive zoning or environmental regulations: If they back policies that limit property development or impose environmental restrictions, it could be seen as government overreach and an infringement on property rights by the Republican majority.
      6. Diverging from the mayor’s agenda: Simply by voting against or vocally opposing the policy priorities and vision set by the Republican mayor, these commissioners can create roadblocks and slow the implementation of the platform the mayor was elected on.
      7. Creating a perception of a divided government: Having a block of Democratic commissioners who are seen as constantly at odds with the Republican leadership could foster a perception of gridlock and dysfunction in city government, making it harder to attract new residents and businesses.

      The actual impact would depend on the specific policies and votes of these individual commissioners. It’s possible that they find common ground with their Republican colleagues on many local issues and that their influence is less disruptive than it may appear on the surface.

      Reasons why a predominantly Republican population might elect a Republican mayor but also vote for Democratic commissioners
      1. Split-ticket voting: Some voters may prioritize individual candidates over party affiliation, choosing to vote for the person they believe will do the best job regardless of party. This can lead to a mix of Republicans and Democrats in local government.
      2. Local issues: Municipal elections often hinge on specific local issues that may not fall neatly along partisan lines. Voters might support a Democratic candidate who aligns with their views on a critical local matter, even if they lean Republican in national politics.
      3. Candidate quality: In some cases, the Democratic candidates might simply be seen as more qualified, experienced, or effective campaigners than their Republican opponents, leading even Republican-leaning voters to support them.
      4. Demographic shifts: If there are changing demographics within specific zones or neighborhoods, such as an influx of younger or more diverse residents, it could lead to a shift in voting patterns that doesn’t align with the city’s overall Republican majority.
      Steps Republicans can take to encourage the current commissioners to govern more conservatively
      1. Engage with the commissioners: Republican constituents should communicate their views and priorities to their elected officials, either through attending public meetings, writing letters, or requesting one-on-one discussions. If commissioners hear a consistent message from their Republican base, they may be more likely to take those perspectives into account.
      2. Hold commissioners accountable: Closely monitor the votes and actions of the Democratic commissioners. If they consistently oppose Republican priorities or side with liberal interest groups, make those decisions known to the public and underscore the consequences.
      3. Identify and support strong Republican candidates: For upcoming elections, Republican leaders should recruit qualified, appealing candidates who can articulate a conservative vision for the city and draw a clear contrast with their Democratic opponents.
      4. Mobilize Republican voters: Ensure that Republican voters are engaged, informed, and turning out to the polls in high numbers for every municipal election. This may involve increased voter outreach, registration drives, and get-out-the-vote efforts.
      5. Frame local issues in conservative terms: Work to shape the public discourse around key local issues, emphasizing how conservative policies can address voters’ concerns and improve quality of life. Highlight successful examples of Republican leadership in other cities.
      6. Build coalitions: Reach out to independents, moderate Democrats, and key constituency groups who may be open to supporting Republican candidates if they feel their interests are being addressed. Building a broad base of support is critical in local elections.
      7. Play the long game: Recognize that shifting a city’s political balance is a gradual process. Focus on incremental progress, celebrate small victories, and keep working to build a stronger Republican bench for future cycles.
      Key policy areas that a Republican majority population might want their Democratic commissioners to focus on
      1. Fiscal responsibility: Insist on balanced budgets, spending cuts, and opposition to any new taxes or fees. Push for commissioners to prioritize essential services like public safety and infrastructure over expanding government programs.
      2. Economic growth: Advocate for policies that support local businesses, attract new companies, and create jobs. This could include streamlining regulations, offering tax incentives, and investing in workforce development programs.
      3. Public safety: Demand a strong commitment to law and order, with full funding and support for the police department. Ask commissioners to take a tough stance on crime and reject any efforts to defund or undermine law enforcement.
      4. Private property rights: Call on commissioners to protect the rights of property owners and resist any attempts to impose overly restrictive zoning, environmental, or aesthetic regulations on private land use.
      5. Limited government: Push back against attempts to expand the size or scope of city government. Insist that commissioners justify any new programs or initiatives and look for ways to privatize services where possible.
      6. Traditional values: In debates over social issues or cultural matters, ask commissioners to respect the traditional values held by many Republicans, such as support for families, personal responsibility, and individual liberty.
      7. Second Amendment rights: In a state like Florida, many Republicans strongly support gun rights. Ask commissioners to oppose any local restrictions on firearm ownership or use and to support policies that protect the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
      8. Transparency and accountability: Demand that commissioners operate in an open and transparent manner, with regular communication and opportunities for public input. Hold them accountable for their votes and positions, and insist on explanations for any actions that seem to deviate from conservative principles.
      9. Collaborative approach: While pushing for conservative policies, also encourage commissioners to find areas of common ground and work collaboratively with their Republican colleagues whenever possible. Emphasize the importance of civil discourse and pragmatic problem-solving.
      10. Respect for the will of the voters: Remind commissioners that they were elected to represent all their constituents, and that in a predominantly Republican area, they have an obligation to give significant weight to the concerns and priorities of their conservative residents.